W
Resource Links
Examples
For Your Clients
The Authors
Site Index
The Virtual Last Chapter

 

Print vs. Web

The World Wide Web is a fascinating mix of great convenience and great limitations. The limitations are mostly in the realm of our design expectations, and our expectations tend to come from the printed world, a world we know very well. Below is a list of a number of things you just have to understand and accept about web design that are so different from print design. Realize there are areas over which you have no precise control—then let go.

In print:   On the web:

Everyone sees the same color.

 

There are a limited amount of colors that are “web-safe,” or relatively consistent on all computers. Even among this limited color palette, the color looks different on every monitor in the world. Walk into any computer lab and open the same page on each computer—the same page will look different on every machine.

 

Everyone sees the same typeface and size of text.

 

Users can change their own default fonts. Browsers display text differently. Computers size text differently. Your designer can use style sheets to make text more consistent, but there is no way to guarantee that every user will see the same size and typeface.

 

Everyone sees the same graphics and the same quality.

 

The user can choose to display or not to display graphics. The monitor can determine the quality of the graphics. Different computers show graphics darker or lighter.

 

Everyone knows where to find the beginning and the end of the document.

 

Users often drop into a site right in the middle, rather than at the home page, and need clear markers to get “home.”

 

Everyone knows how to turn a page, get to the table of contents, use the index, etc.  

Users need a clear navigation system, one of the most challenging and important tasks for the designer. This navigation system needs to be consistent throughout the site—don’t ask your designer to redesign a new navigation bar for every page. They are not being lazy by using the same “nav bar” on each page—they are providing a clear, understandable pattern for the user.

 

Everyone knows how big the printed piece is simply by looking at it, and we all have a clear idea how much of the document we have read at any time.  

A web site is amorphous—it is good to give users some clues as to the size. And it’s good to give them clues as to how much ground they have covered once they start wandering through your pages. This takes time, thought, and creativity from your designer, which costs you money (this feature is typically built into the navigation system). Don’t cut corners here.

 

Designing documents for print is fairly predictable: graphics stay where you place them, text doesn’t change all by itself, you know who is going to print the job and exactly how to prepare it for that particular press, etc.  

Designing web pages is actually rather frustrating: elements move all over the place; elements (especially tables) seem to change their minds all by themselves; objects appear in different places in different browsers; the designer has to take into consideration a huge variety of possible systems that the pages will be displayed on, as well as take into consideration all users’ possible defaults and how they will affect the page. It takes much longer to design and build a web site than it does to create a comparable print piece. (Although it is just as easy to build an ugly web page as it is to design an ugly flier.)

 

At some point, the print project is finished, complete, done, over, and all wrapped up. You pay the bill and move on.  

A web site is never finished. Sigh. You have a commitment to updating and renovating for the rest of your company’s life. And you have a commitment to constantly publicize your site and submit/resubmit the information to search engines.

 

Top of page  

previous page